Mocko falsely accused a user
← Back to Index

Mocko.ai accused a reviewer of being a "fake competitor" and claimed Trustpilot "allows toxic behavior"

Mocko.ai SparkBridge TEF Trustpilot Accusation Guidelines Law Evidence Justice Public Record
Mocko.ai publicly accused a reviewer of being a “fake competitor,” claimed Trustpilot “allows toxic behaviour,” and quietly edited its Terms of Service after being exposed — a direct violation of Trustpilot’s guidelines requiring respectful, professional conduct.
For any privacy or legal concern, visit: LEGAL COMPLIANCE & FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION STATEMENT

Overview

Mocko official website Mocko.ai is an AI-powered platform designed to help language learners prepare for standardized exams, primarily focusing on French proficiency tests like TEF and TCF(often used for Canadian immigration).

Vancouver tech journal about Mocko Vancouver tech journal about Mocko founders According to Vancouver Tech Journal(https://vantechjournal.com/p/vancouver-startup-transforms-language-testing), founders of Mocko.ai are Ken, Yu, and Nima.

Trustpilot for Mocko Trustpilot is a digital consumer review website that allows people to read and write feedback about businesses and e-commerce stores. It functions as an open, third-party platform where shoppers can gauge a brand's reputation and companies can collect customer ratings.

Screenshots of publicly available media were captured before they disappeared.

Accusation Done by Mocko.ai

On Jul 14, 2026, user "diurnal ca" posted a review on Trustpilot: Unprofessional behaviors of Mocko.ai
I’m leaving this review on Trustpilot because this honestly made me question how seriously Mocka.ai takes its own website.

In the “Governing Law” section of their Terms of Service, it literally says:

“[Your Jurisdiction, e.g., British Columbia, Canada]”

That is obviously unfinished template text. This is not some tiny typo buried on a random page, it is part of a legal document customers are expected to agree to.

How does a company publish Terms of Service without even entering its actual jurisdiction? It looks careless, rushed, and extremely unprofessional. If the legal pages have not been properly checked, what else has been overlooked?

They are claiming now it is fake. You guys can check the website check their terms-of-service but probably before you check they will fix it. I just wanted show unprofessional they are. Please be careful before giving any data.

Another Edit :
Now they have updated, and they were calling it fake. Bunch of donuts. Instead of fixing it calling people fake. Dont spend any money on these guys
Later Mocko replied: Mocko's accusation against user and trustpilot
This is clearly a fake review by a competitor. It is very unfortunate that Trustpilot would allow such toxic behaviour.

Update: We contacted the phone number provided by this person. It was a random number not associated with this reviewer. The provided email were also fake and had never used in our platform.

Evidence

Mocko terms of service before Mocko terms of service after
Timestamp for Mocko terms of service before Timestamp for Mocko terms of service after

Trustpilot Guidelines

Trustpilot guidelines for businesses
Trustpilot terms of use and sale for businesses section 13
Trustpilot terms of use and sale for businesses section 21 Trustpilot terms of use and sale for businesses section 21, being disrespectful to trustpilot

Reporting This Company To Trustpilot

Reporting misconduct of Mocko.ai to Trustpilot On Jul 16, 2026, Trustpilot agent Omnia has received the request with evidence about misconduct of Mocko.ai